Exemplar analysis

- The candidate uses her old production to explain what she did differently to create her second, better one. For example, the use of Photoshop as oppose to Publisher was explained.
-However, the only thing the candidate talks about is the basics between how he/she used the programs.It would have been better if they explained in detail how the  use of advanced programs helped her to be more creative and make a better product than before.
-The candidate references an existing theory to do with their coursework; 'David Gauntlett' and relates it to how their product has changed for the better by using it as support for what they have done.
-They have only identified one or two conventions of the product

-The candidate takes into account the role of the audience when talking about why they do what the do for the portfolio.

-Spoken about the research conducted for it and have said why they would apply similar things to their own product.

-They do this by explaining their understanding of representation and applying it to their work and audience.

-A High range of key media terminology is used throughout both answers; 'representation', 'mise en scene'

-Also uses a wide range of examples of artists relevant t the still of product they are making and explaining them in terms of representation.